|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 19, 2020 5:20:09 GMT
So how are we gonna build this thing? This is such a wide open challenge and I’ve never quite attempted anything like this before.
I wonder if we could trick our bot into forming alliances.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tetra on Mar 19, 2020 12:59:27 GMT
Maybe something like:
Round 1: Highest social
Round 2: Highest strength
Round 3/Jury: Most challenges won->least votes received
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 19, 2020 14:16:46 GMT
You know what? I may actually just literally code a bloody bot, with actual C++ later when I actually wake up.
Still sleeping constantly.
I miss the fucking weather.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 20, 2020 4:57:41 GMT
class SurvivorBot {
public:
int savviness = 33;
int strength = 34;
int sociability = 33;
SurvivorBot tribalCouncil1() {
}
SurvivorBot tribalCouncil2() {
}
SurvivorBot tribalCouncil3() {
}
SurvivorBot jury() {
}
private:
SurvivorBot vote(SurvivorBot voteTarget) {
return voteTarget;
}
}
class Game {
public:
SurvivorBot contestants[5];
}
main() {
Game challenge7;
SurvivorBot district12;
district12.challenge1();
district12.tribalCouncil1();
if (district12.isin(challenge7){
district12.challenge2();
district12.tribalCouncil2();
if (district12.isin(challenge7) {
district12.challenge3();
district12.tribalCouncil3();
}
}
if (! district12.isin(challenge7){
return district12.jury();
}
}
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 20, 2020 4:58:14 GMT
Now we just fill out how we're going to vote in each tribal council, and the jury vote if our bot is garbage enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 20, 2020 8:03:07 GMT
Thoughts:
Having a mediocre but average set of attributes such as 33, 34, 33 won't win us a single challenge, but we'd also generally escape unvoted upon. I imagine if we create an exceptionally high or low stat, we could be targeted.
I wonder what would happen if we vote out whoever had the highest of the non-tested stats from the previous challenge, if that would help our odds.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tetra on Mar 20, 2020 12:38:15 GMT
Maybe something like: Round 1: Highest social Round 2: Highest strength Round 3/Jury: Most challenges won->least votes received What if we just went with this? |
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 20, 2020 13:43:12 GMT
Challenges 1 and 2 may be won by separate people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tetra on Mar 20, 2020 14:49:38 GMT
What part does that matter for?
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 20, 2020 17:19:12 GMT
If challenge 1 gets picked up by district A, and challenge 2 gets picked up by district B, and D and E get voted out, and we are district C, who do we vote for?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tetra on Mar 20, 2020 17:43:27 GMT
Whoever’s received the least voted
|
|
|
|
Post by Tetra on Mar 21, 2020 0:31:01 GMT
Round 1: Highest social
Round 2: Highest strength
Round 3/Jury: Most challenges won->least votes received
Strength: 34
Sociability: 33
Savviness: 33
If Wenya doesn’t show up with a final submission/previous submission isn’t fully counted then just go with this
|
|
|
|
Post by Wenya Zhu on Mar 21, 2020 2:18:09 GMT
Yeah, go with that. Sorry, I got held late at work.
|
|
